data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/523a1/523a19e5fe4c45eafb09005e52bf7ec16767e8da" alt="Super metroid ceiling etank damage boost"
- Super metroid ceiling etank damage boost manual#
- Super metroid ceiling etank damage boost full#
- Super metroid ceiling etank damage boost series#
There is also the fact that Nintendo has been known to be incorrect about such things in the past. They have refined their timeline after the addition of new games. Information has been changed, researched. Who does have any idea of the designer's original intent? Do you? If not then how can you still post a timeline about the series? I won't deny that some of Nintendo's ads or reviews in Nintendo Power actually called Zero Mission a remake, but again, that was then and this is now.
Super metroid ceiling etank damage boost series#
They have been wrong about that series countless times, and currently have no timeline for it because they cannot create one that is consistent. You talk about their reliability? Just look at the Zelda series. Poiuyt Man talk 9 July 2005 00:05 (UTC) You talk about Nintendo's word, but whose word is it that works at Nintendo? For all you know, any information that you get from them is the generic response of a customer service representative that is no authority on the game. If the game was truly meant to be a prequel, then why would they word the ads and box description to suggest otherwise, and try to hide the truth through vague semantics? See Occam's Razor the simplest explanation is likely the most correct one. For purposes of this article, even if Nintendo's word is unreliable as you say, it still overrules your own theories, for you did not make the game, and you have no idea of the designers' original intent.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a770/7a7702f9a175dc0bb73a10e4a2baade826cf7ee4" alt="super metroid ceiling etank damage boost super metroid ceiling etank damage boost"
The Nintendo e-mail replies in that forum are very ambiguous in the wording, and seem to be written by customer service representatives, for they simply restate the game's promotional material. A discussion in Nintendo's official forum caused three people to e-mail Nintendo asking if Zero Mission was a remake or not, Nintendo representatives replied differently, but all agreed that Zero Mission was not the mission seen in Metroid. Even Nintendo has changed their theory about the series and now say that they are separate games.
Super metroid ceiling etank damage boost manual#
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f73d/7f73decfe3b58976c80c9b2c04598bf6333dd87f" alt="super metroid ceiling etank damage boost super metroid ceiling etank damage boost"
On a side note, I wouldn't mind a "Metroid: Ground Zero" for Gamecube that remade Zero Mission in 3D :) - User:Bluefoxicy Dai Grepher: Nintendo also says this:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0ad5/f0ad55b38299cebc5bc995646a0313366e4ca235" alt="super metroid ceiling etank damage boost super metroid ceiling etank damage boost"
Aside from the obvious marketting as a remake, the first game was the beginning. The manual for the original Metroid for NES points out that Metroids are a new airborn life form which has just been discovered- and then stolen by space pirates. Poiuyt Man talk 8 July 2005 21:52 (UTC)
Super metroid ceiling etank damage boost full#
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/523a1/523a19e5fe4c45eafb09005e52bf7ec16767e8da" alt="Super metroid ceiling etank damage boost"